1 |
maillog: 11/05/2004-17:37:39(-0400): Kevin types |
2 |
> On Tuesday 11 May 2004 15:38, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
3 |
> > On Tuesday 11 May 2004 20:55, Kevin wrote: |
4 |
> > > |
5 |
> > > Thanks for your reply, Greg. Although what you say here may be |
6 |
> > > true in some circumstances, I think you're wrong in this case. You |
7 |
> > > may have stopped reading after the above paragraph, but in the rest |
8 |
> > > of my post, I describe how a SuSE9 distro installed on this same |
9 |
> > > hardware has no problems doing all of the things that failed in |
10 |
> > > Gentoo. That's a pretty strong indication that there are no |
11 |
> > > hardware problems, isn't it? |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > Do you also have errors when you run a vanilla kernel? |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Yes, I mentioned that in my first post. Or by vanilla do you mean a |
16 |
> kernel from kernel.org (as opposed to the Gentoo vanilla-sources |
17 |
> kernel---that's the one I tried; isn't that identical to the kernel |
18 |
> from kernel.org?) |
19 |
|
20 |
You didn't try development-sources, according to your original post. You only |
21 |
mention 2.6.5 gentoo-sources. What about a vanilla 2.6.5 (2.6.6 already)? |
22 |
|
23 |
> > What if you |
24 |
> > take the kernel from SUSE, |
25 |
> |
26 |
> I haven't tried installing Gentoo with my SuSE kernel running. Huh... |
27 |
> what a concept. With all the modularity of those default distro |
28 |
> kernels, would that even work? Maybe I'd need the kernel, the |
29 |
> System.map, and the /lib/modules/`uname -r` directory? |
30 |
|
31 |
You don't even need the System.map. |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
*- Georgi Georgiev *- By golly, I'm beginning to think Linux *- |
35 |
-* chutz@×××.net -* really *is* the best thing since sliced -* |
36 |
*- +81(90)6266-1163 *- bread. *- |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |