| 1 |
On Sat, 2012-11-24 at 08:07 -0800, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 24/11/2012 07:46, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
| 3 |
> > For ruby19, split in the middle to get 1.9, but what about 110, is it |
| 4 |
> > 11.0 or 1.10. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Okay stop. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> There's no 1.10. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> There's 2.0 that's being developed for a long time. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> And we're not going to change our scheme just because of some |
| 13 |
> theoretical corner case that has been proven not happening in our world. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Especially since we were the first (and not even with ruby-ng, the |
| 16 |
> syntax has been the same for years, starting with ruby16). |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Sorry, I didn't mean/intend to pick on ruby. I personally don't use it, |
| 20 |
nor do I have RUBY_TARGETS, or PHP_TARGETS set. I was just trying to |
| 21 |
point out a possible flaw in using that scheme as a common method of |
| 22 |
specifying versions in all those variables, or any future *_TARGETS type |
| 23 |
variable. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
ok, then please substitute "foo" for any ruby, python, php references in |
| 26 |
my previuos post... |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
If we are going to come up with a common way of doing it, we will need |
| 29 |
to consider such a "corner case" so that we have as few exceptions to |
| 30 |
the rule as possible. Unlike the English language that I think too |
| 31 |
often has more exceptions to the rule than ones that actually follow the |
| 32 |
rule :/ |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
It was not my intention to start yet ANOTHER -dev mail list flame war! |
| 35 |
My apologies to the list. |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> |
Archives