| 1 |
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:39:18 +0100 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 19:25:33 +0000 |
| 5 |
> James Le Cuirot <chewi@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 19:35:55 +0100 |
| 8 |
> > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > > The only maintainer of gpe herd is MIA for some time, and this |
| 11 |
> > > pretty much renders the whole thing maintainer-needed. |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > > Is anyone interested in keeping the herd as-is and maintaining all |
| 14 |
> > > packages in it? If I get no reply till 2016-01-24, I will |
| 15 |
> > > effectively remove the herd and announce the packages that landed |
| 16 |
> > > in maintainer- -needed as a result. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > All that stuff got masked for removal by Pacho recently anyway. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> If you mean the matchbox set, it doesn't cover all of those packages. |
| 21 |
> Unless they were masked separately. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Only x11-libs/libfakekey and x11-libs/libxsettings-client are still |
| 25 |
unmasked; both of them have additional maintainers, so nothing will |
| 26 |
have to go to maintainer-neeeded@ when the GPE herd is disbanded. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
By the way, x11-libs/libxsettings-client doesn't have any revdeps and |
| 29 |
looks like it could be removed along with the other GPE stuff. |
| 30 |
libfakekey still has some revdeps, though. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Luis Ressel |
Archives