| 1 |
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:38:06 +0300 |
| 2 |
Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 23:25:16 +0200 |
| 5 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 23:57:57 +0300 |
| 8 |
> > Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > > But there is no simple way to install such helpers from ebuilds. |
| 11 |
> > > The tmpfiles.d is aimed to help in such situations. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Yes, there is. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > $ grep dotmpfiles *.eclass |
| 16 |
> > systemd.eclass:# @FUNCTION: systemd_dotmpfilesd |
| 17 |
> > systemd.eclass:systemd_dotmpfilesd() { |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > Well, it doesn't have a new* variant but I guess that can be added |
| 20 |
> > if necessary. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Oh, nice. What do you think of moving those helper implementations to |
| 23 |
> tmpfiles-d.eclass and make |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> systemd_dotmpfilesd() { dotmpfiles_d "$@"; } |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> as William suggested? That way we would not impose blocker DEPENDs |
| 28 |
> from systemd.eclass to users and might help adding {do,new}tmpfiles_d |
| 29 |
> to later EAPIs |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
These blockers do not hurt. They're against ancient systemd versions, |
| 32 |
and they're going to be removed soon as well. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
> > Also, maybe for some devs a easy make_tmpfiles_d() function will be |
| 35 |
> > useful too... |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> Yeah, it would be handier to have more freedom in file naming in |
| 38 |
> ${FILESDIR} like 'proftpd/files/tmpfiles.d-r1.conf' and not just |
| 39 |
> proftpd.conf (which is the name of server config file) |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
I mean function where you wouldn't have to learn the syntax, like we |
| 42 |
have make_desktop_entry(). |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
Best regards, |
| 46 |
Michał Górny |
Archives