| 1 |
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 23:25:16 +0200 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 23:57:57 +0300 |
| 5 |
> Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > But there is no simple way to install such helpers from ebuilds. |
| 8 |
> > The tmpfiles.d is aimed to help in such situations. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Yes, there is. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> $ grep dotmpfiles *.eclass |
| 13 |
> systemd.eclass:# @FUNCTION: systemd_dotmpfilesd |
| 14 |
> systemd.eclass:systemd_dotmpfilesd() { |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Well, it doesn't have a new* variant but I guess that can be added if |
| 17 |
> necessary. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Oh, nice. What do you think of moving those helper implementations to |
| 20 |
tmpfiles-d.eclass and make |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
systemd_dotmpfilesd() { dotmpfiles_d "$@"; } |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
as William suggested? That way we would not impose blocker DEPENDs from |
| 25 |
systemd.eclass to users and might help adding {do,new}tmpfiles_d to later EAPIs |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> Also, maybe for some devs a easy make_tmpfiles_d() function will be |
| 28 |
> useful too... |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Yeah, it would be handier to have more freedom in file naming in ${FILESDIR} |
| 31 |
like 'proftpd/files/tmpfiles.d-r1.conf' and not just proftpd.conf (which is the |
| 32 |
name of server config file) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
I don't care who will write/commit tmpfiles-d.eclass :] |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Thanks! |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Sergei |
Archives