1 |
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:17:16PM +0200, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: |
2 |
> On 8/30/15 12:02 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: |
3 |
> > Or upstream might be a monolithic giant like Google where their |
4 |
> > upstream bug tracking is some pointless forum where you get ignored by |
5 |
> > the people actually working on things. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Ouch. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Do you have specific examples? |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I'm not denying they exist. I just had mostly positive experience with |
12 |
> <https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues> . Because I'm also Chromium |
13 |
> developer, I know that's what people "actually working on things" use. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I admit with 85000+ open issues not all of them are getting enough |
16 |
> attention. But if you know an upstream developer, it's easier to get the |
17 |
> right people to look at the bug. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Of course above is not the only Google project, and I don't have much |
20 |
> experience with the other ones. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Paweł |
23 |
|
24 |
I dont know what ones he's talking about, but I have this one: |
25 |
|
26 |
https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=175284 |
27 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=533178 |
28 |
|
29 |
Android Studio is released as a compiled binary for windows/mac/linux |
30 |
but there is no source code for it. And to make matters even worse they |
31 |
don't have proper tags in the git repos for it so I can't even just make |
32 |
the tarballs myself because I dont know which commits correspond to the |
33 |
releases. They just closed the bug as declined with no reason given :(. |
34 |
|
35 |
-- Jason |