Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Paweł Hajdan
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Better way to direct upstream bugs upstream?
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 19:17:36
Message-Id: 55E74B3C.5060704@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Better way to direct upstream bugs upstream? by Kent Fredric
1 On 8/30/15 12:02 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
2 > Or upstream might be a monolithic giant like Google where their
3 > upstream bug tracking is some pointless forum where you get ignored by
4 > the people actually working on things.
5
6 Ouch.
7
8 Do you have specific examples?
9
10 I'm not denying they exist. I just had mostly positive experience with
11 <https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues> . Because I'm also Chromium
12 developer, I know that's what people "actually working on things" use.
13
14 I admit with 85000+ open issues not all of them are getting enough
15 attention. But if you know an upstream developer, it's easier to get the
16 right people to look at the bug.
17
18 Of course above is not the only Google project, and I don't have much
19 experience with the other ones.
20
21 Paweł

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Better way to direct upstream bugs upstream? Jason Zaman <perfinion@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Better way to direct upstream bugs upstream? Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>