| 1 |
We could clearly discuss forever, but since you refuse to engage with |
| 2 |
my constructive proposition and my ask for feedback there's no point, |
| 3 |
is there? It's super sad that you behave like that in Gentoo. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Michał Górny wrote: |
| 7 |
> Choice for the sake of choice is meaningless. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Far from it. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> So far nobody has been able to find a strong argument for choosing |
| 13 |
> LibreSSL. There are strong arguments for using OpenSSL instead. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
That's like your opinion, man. :) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> Maybe LibreSSL had promised a better taste in the beginning but today |
| 19 |
> 9 out of 10 consumers say OpenSSL tastes much better. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
It's usually harmful to optimize for popularity; smoking isn't a good |
| 22 |
idea even if everyone in school does it. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> The only difference is that you don't have to pay |
| 26 |
> for it (but we do!), so you think that it's free. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Please stop playing the victim and engage with my proposal instead. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I'd appreciate feedback from everyone. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Thanks a lot |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
//Peter |
Archives