| 1 |
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:13:49AM +0100 or thereabouts, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 2 |
> It would be included into the snapshot for x86 and ppc only. It is very |
| 3 |
> uncommon for an ebuild that is stable enough to go into the snapshot to |
| 4 |
> be accidently marked stable for an arch. Also we will have QA over the |
| 5 |
> snapshot before it is released. This QA will at least involve making all |
| 6 |
> packages (for a GRP tree). As we are dealing with a snapshot it is |
| 7 |
> actually easier to ensure that things compile because a lot of variation |
| 8 |
> is taken away. You can ensure that you only have say openssl-0.7 so you |
| 9 |
> don't get problems with openssl-6 |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I think you may be confusing the snapshot we make for GRP packages with the |
| 12 |
proposed stable tree. There are no plans to offer GRP packages of the |
| 13 |
stable tree. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Not to say we can't/won't do it, but it's not included as part of this |
| 16 |
GLEP. Again, if the QA folks want to leverage this tree and provide |
| 17 |
additional QA efforts around it, that's great. That's not the primary |
| 18 |
target of this GLEP, however. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
--kurt |
Archives