1 |
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 23:00:04 -0400 |
2 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Saturday 28 October 2006 22:43, Marius Mauch wrote: |
5 |
> > Well, I'd go further and question the whole herd concept. What |
6 |
> > benefits do we actually gain by having "herds"? For the most part |
7 |
> > it's just a way to associate a package with a mail alias, but for |
8 |
> > that I don't really see the need for this layer of indirection. It |
9 |
> > actually creates problems by itself as the herd data ("members" in |
10 |
> > herds.xml) gets out of sync with the mail data (alias members), |
11 |
> > then there is the (mostly historical) issue of having two copies of |
12 |
> > the same file getting out of sync, the permanent confusion of |
13 |
> > herds, herd maintainers and projects, and the problem just shown by |
14 |
> > Alec. So are there any other benefits in having herds as opposed to |
15 |
> > just adding a |
16 |
> > <maintainer><email>mail-alias@g.o</email></maintainer> |
17 |
> > element to metadata.xml and getting rid of the complete herds |
18 |
> > concept? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> just because you're on the alias doesnt mean you want to be |
21 |
> responsible for the packages in the herd |
22 |
|
23 |
So if now you're on a herd alias but not listed in herds.xml for a herd, |
24 |
what practical difference does it make if the herd exists or not? |
25 |
|
26 |
Marius |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
30 |
|
31 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
32 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |