Archives
Archives
| From: | "Peter Volkov (pva)" <pva@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] fixing up portage implicit RDEPEND behavior | ||
| Date: | Fri, 03 Nov 2006 09:36:01 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1162546352.8060.45.camel@localhost | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] fixing up portage implicit RDEPEND behavior by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | On 2006-11-03 at 00:43 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 | > Also, some ebuilds will loose some implicit RDEPEND that they current |
| 3 | > get from eclasses. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Why? I suppose more logical solution is to adjoin DEPEND from ebuild and |
| 6 | RDEPEND from eclass. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Peter. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] fixing up portage implicit RDEPEND behavior | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] fixing up portage implicit RDEPEND behavior | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |