Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] fixing up portage implicit RDEPEND behavior | ||
| Date: | Fri, 03 Nov 2006 13:06:28 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200611030802.16935.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] fixing up portage implicit RDEPEND behavior by "Peter Volkov (pva)" |
||
| 1 | On Friday 03 November 2006 04:32, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote: |
| 2 | > On 2006-11-03 at 00:43 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 3 | > > Also, some ebuilds will loose some implicit RDEPEND that they current |
| 4 | > > get from eclasses. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > I suppose more logical solution is to adjoin DEPEND from ebuild and |
| 7 | > RDEPEND from eclass. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | that is the behavior that we'd be moving to |
| 10 | -mike |