1 |
Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
2 |
> In my original email, I also suggested this solution, but it seems that nobody |
3 |
> read it: |
4 |
> ] Alternatively, follow the example of any ebuild that uses a dated |
5 |
> ] patchset, and just have the date of the patchset in the ebuild, and only |
6 |
> ] increment $PR singly. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> This solution already exists in MANY places in the tree, and should probably be |
9 |
> preferred over the long $PR or $RC values. |
10 |
|
11 |
Yeah, except revisions are supposed to be for changes to ebuild code, |
12 |
not upstream code. |
13 |
|
14 |
This gets problematic for people trying to report bugs to upstream, |
15 |
because they and upstream have no idea what code they're actually running. |
16 |
|
17 |
Thanks, |
18 |
Donnie |
19 |
-- |
20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |