Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Williams <mike@××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] modular X - 7.0 RC1
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:26:53
Message-Id: 200510201623.28687.mike@gaima.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] modular X - 7.0 RC1 by Dan Armak
1 On Thursday 20 October 2005 14:26, Dan Armak wrote:
2 > To keep the current behaviour, the kde metaebuild (and gnome and the other
3 > WMs) would have to depend on xorg-x11, which strictly speaking is
4 > unnecessary. Opinions? How can we educate the users to manually 'emerge
5 > xorg-x11'? Personally I'm in favor of updating the docs, making a big
6 > announcement on all channels, and preparing a nice bug to close duplicates
7 > against.
8 >
9 > We'll also need to educate them about xorg-x11 not installing fonts any
10 > longer. The way I understood your metabuilds.txt, 'emerge xorg-x11 kde'
11 > would result in an unusable system without any fonts at all...
12
13 As a fairly average joe user when it comes to all things X, I feel it would be
14 best to keep the current X USE flag behaviour, i.e. a full working Xserver.
15 The same goes for xorg-x11, or virtual/x11.
16 KDE needs some X libs, so obviously must always depend on them, but having the
17 X USE set should call in a complete working server.
18
19 For packages that can work with, or without X, and should give the option to
20 have a full server, or not, perhaps a new USE flag is needed? Xlibs?
21
22 --
23 Mike Williams
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] modular X - 7.0 RC1 Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>