1 |
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 15:23 schrieb Matthias Schwarzott: |
2 |
> On Wednesday 12 July 2006 15:16, Danny van Dyk wrote: |
3 |
> > Hi all, |
4 |
|
5 |
> While reading your list I have seen pcmcia often. e.g. on my ebuild |
6 |
> v4l-dvb-hg not supporting pcmcia as conditional. A bit digging showed |
7 |
> that linux-mod.eclass contains this code: |
8 |
> |
9 |
> --cut-- |
10 |
> IUSE="" # don't put pcmcia here, rather in the ebuilds that actually |
11 |
> support pcmcia |
12 |
> SLOT="0" |
13 |
> DESCRIPTION="Based on the $ECLASS eclass" |
14 |
> RDEPEND="kernel_linux? ( virtual/modutils |
15 |
> pcmcia? ( virtual/pcmcia ) )" |
16 |
> --cut-- |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I don't know if pcmcia should then be added to every ebuild including |
19 |
> linux-mod.eclass. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Please solve this before adding pcmcia on every kernel-module-ebuild. |
22 |
|
23 |
I've ceased adding pcmcia to IUSE after 3 commits. |
24 |
genstef will be talking with kernel team about this. I'd suggest to |
25 |
split the pcmcia dep to a different eclass, but that's just my opinion. |
26 |
|
27 |
Danny |
28 |
-- |
29 |
Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
30 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project |
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |