| 1 |
2011/8/1 Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o>: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 13:30:37 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Marc Schiffbauer <mschiff@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> * Pacho Ramos schrieb am 01.08.11 um 13:19 Uhr: |
| 6 |
>> > Having /usr/portage on a different partition will still be |
| 7 |
>> > supported if I understood correctly (at least, it still works fine |
| 8 |
>> > for me even having the rest of /usr under / partition) |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> yes. My point was, that if you have a separate /usr you may be ok |
| 11 |
>> with no seperate /usr/portage |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Don't really think so. /usr/portage is a very specific fs, and it's |
| 14 |
> better to always keep it separated. That's one thing which can be |
| 15 |
> restored with a simple 'emerge --sync'. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
everything about portage is very specific and should be separated, I |
| 18 |
would like to see an addition of one root directory "gentoo" where |
| 19 |
${PKGMANAGER} keep all it's stuff. |
| 20 |
Some of these are already moveable with ${*DIR} variables in |
| 21 |
make.conf, others are not |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
20K /gentoo/tmp |
| 24 |
20K /gentoo/overlays |
| 25 |
639M /gentoo/portage |
| 26 |
3.1G /gentoo/distfiles |
| 27 |
4.1M /gentoo/var/log |
| 28 |
36K /gentoo/var/lib/portage |
| 29 |
43M /gentoo/var/db/pkg |
| 30 |
940K /gentoo/var/cache/edb |
| 31 |
2.7M /gentoo/packages |
Archives