From: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Cc: | mschiff@g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? | ||
Date: | Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:50:12 | ||
Message-Id: | 20110801175042.12b4cb73@pomiocik.lan | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? by Marc Schiffbauer |
1 | On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 13:30:37 +0200 |
2 | Marc Schiffbauer <mschiff@g.o> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > * Pacho Ramos schrieb am 01.08.11 um 13:19 Uhr: |
5 | > > Having /usr/portage on a different partition will still be |
6 | > > supported if I understood correctly (at least, it still works fine |
7 | > > for me even having the rest of /usr under / partition) |
8 | > |
9 | > yes. My point was, that if you have a separate /usr you may be ok |
10 | > with no seperate /usr/portage |
11 | |
12 | Don't really think so. /usr/portage is a very specific fs, and it's |
13 | better to always keep it separated. That's one thing which can be |
14 | restored with a simple 'emerge --sync'. |
15 | |
16 | -- |
17 | Best regards, |
18 | Michał Górny |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? | Francesco Riosa <vivo75@×××××.com> |