| 1 |
* Pacho Ramos schrieb am 01.08.11 um 13:19 Uhr: |
| 2 |
> El lun, 01-08-2011 a las 13:12 +0200, Marc Schiffbauer escribió: |
| 3 |
> [...] |
| 4 |
> > * /usr/portage can get very huge and is often written to. With |
| 5 |
> > / and /usr being on the same FS you really want to have |
| 6 |
> > /usr/portage on a seperate FS then |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > I am sure there are some other reasons too. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Just my 2¢ |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > -Marc |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Having /usr/portage on a different partition will still be supported if |
| 15 |
> I understood correctly (at least, it still works fine for me even having |
| 16 |
> the rest of /usr under / partition) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
yes. My point was, that if you have a separate /usr you may be ok |
| 19 |
with no seperate /usr/portage |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-Marc |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317 3723 296C 6CCA 35A6 4134 |
Archives