Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ben Kohler <bkohler@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:39:13
Message-Id: CANSUr=+2Rew1fnaUE8Bpe3bF9XeBr3aPWBgAvCOxV5mzBk8sUQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:36 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. <wlt-ml@××××××.com>
2 wrote:
3
4 > ...
5 > Calculating dependencies... done!
6 > >>> No packages selected for removal by depclean
7 > >>> To see reverse dependencies, use --verbose
8 > Packages installed: 1779
9 > Packages in world: 194
10 > ...
11 >
12 # emerge -pC gcc
13 > * This action can remove important packages! In order to be safer, use
14 > * `emerge -pv --depclean <atom>` to check for reverse dependencies
15 > before
16 > * removing packages.
17 >
18 > ...
19 >
20 > You aren't taking the time to read your own emerge output. Now, both of
21 these recommend --pretend, but you can use --ask with it, for a safe
22 unmerge that checks for reverse deps THEN allows you to continue only if
23 it's safe.
24
25 Try "emerge -cav gcc.
26
27 -Ben

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>