Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:36:28
Message-Id: assp.0364d58ca9.20170710153616.6b1ef5c1@o-sinc.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds by Ben Kohler
1 On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:28:29 -0500
2 Ben Kohler <bkohler@×××××.com> wrote:
3 >
4 > Use -c rather than -C, like grknight suggested, and it will.
5
6 It does not remove, but does not say why either. Which a user may
7 likely proceed with using -C, as -c had no effect nor did it say why it
8 took no action.
9
10 # emerge -pc tomcat-servlet-api
11
12 Calculating dependencies... done!
13 >>> No packages selected for removal by depclean
14 >>> To see reverse dependencies, use --verbose
15 Packages installed: 1779
16 Packages in world: 194
17 Packages in system: 257
18 Required packages: 1779
19 Number to remove: 0
20
21 Even when using -C, you still get a warning. Which should happen for
22 deps just like it does system/world packages.
23
24 # emerge -pC gcc
25 * This action can remove important packages! In order to be safer, use
26 * `emerge -pv --depclean <atom>` to check for reverse dependencies
27 before
28 * removing packages.
29
30 >>> These are the packages that would be unmerged:
31
32
33 !!! 'sys-devel/gcc' is part of your system profile.
34 !!! Unmerging it may be damaging to your system.
35
36
37 sys-devel/gcc
38 selected: 6.3.0
39 protected: none
40 omitted: none
41
42 All selected packages: =sys-devel/gcc-6.3.0
43
44 >>> 'Selected' packages are slated for removal.
45 >>> 'Protected' and 'omitted' packages will not be removed.
46
47
48
49 --
50 William L. Thomson Jr.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds Ben Kohler <bkohler@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>