| 1 |
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:01:08 +0100 |
| 2 |
Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Here we go again. Fine, keep arguing about the really important |
| 4 |
> question "why old X is in the tree when new X is stable". |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Nobody besides that part of the thread is arguing about anything like |
| 7 |
that. If you are upset about the endless debates on treecleaning, |
| 8 |
then I'm sorry for you but I was not part of any of them and didn't |
| 9 |
even read them. I believe you are interpreting what I wrote under this |
| 10 |
perspective: I seriously don't care if bash 3.1 goes away, it's been a |
| 11 |
while since I've not had it installed on any box. You seem to be |
| 12 |
thinking the contrary. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Did anyone actually consider to ask the maintainers instead of opening |
| 15 |
> a public debate on this? I guess no, because |
| 16 |
> bikeshedding in the mailing list is so much better. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Did you even check if my first reply to this thread was not complete |
| 19 |
BS ? I didn't. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Alexis. |
Archives