1 |
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 03:21 +0000, Ed Grimm wrote: |
2 |
> Note that I expect that we'll have all of the above in place sometime |
3 |
> before we've hired our tenth full-time developer. While I don't expect |
4 |
> that we'll have all of them in place before our first full-time |
5 |
> developer, I certainly wouldn't mind. (I think that, so long as this |
6 |
> remains a part-timer operation, having two of the four options generally |
7 |
> available would suffice. That is, until the code items for three and |
8 |
> four are complete, the first two really should be used.) |
9 |
|
10 |
*APPLAUSE* |
11 |
|
12 |
Thank you. This really is the best news I have heard on this. Perhaps |
13 |
we need to use gentoo-announce more. We have several resources at our |
14 |
disposal, the www.gentoo.org site, the forums announcements, the GWN, |
15 |
and the -announce mailing list. |
16 |
|
17 |
I think part of the problem is that some people (myself included) rely |
18 |
on functionality which is not meant to be relied on, such as using |
19 |
hotplug to find devices which were plugged in at boot time, and |
20 |
therefore not *hot plugged* into the machine. |
21 |
|
22 |
Essentially, many people (once again, myself included) were using an |
23 |
application in a way in which is what not intended by the upstream |
24 |
author. The "unwanted" functionality was removed, with lots of big |
25 |
warnings, and many people complained. It happens... big deal. Let's |
26 |
learn from it and move on to working on making a better solution for the |
27 |
future. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Chris Gianelloni |
31 |
Release Engineering - Operational/QA Manager |
32 |
Games - Developer |
33 |
Gentoo Linux |