| 1 |
On 15.03.2015 10:48, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
>> If we want a separate repo/ namespace, we would probably need to |
| 3 |
>> consider moving other repositories there -- at least the |
| 4 |
>> official ones. Of course, it would be a nice result, having |
| 5 |
>> everything hosted on git.g.o as git.g.o/repo/${repo_name}.git. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Isn't "repo" fairly redundant? Everything there is a repository. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
There are Git repositories that do not contain ebuilds up there. So |
| 10 |
"repo" is not redundant if it refers to its "overlays" kind of meaning. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Two examples: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
http://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage-utils.git/ |
| 15 |
http://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/userinfo-scripts.git/ |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Best, |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Sebastian |
Archives