| 1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 15 Mar 2015, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> As for the namespace, proj/ makes most sense of the current |
| 4 |
> namespaces. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
So on gitweb.gentoo.org our main tree would be listed amongst some |
| 7 |
200 other proj repositories, between proj/gentoo-wiki-tyrian.git and |
| 8 |
proj/proj/gentoolkit.git. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I think it deserves a more prominent place. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> If we want a separate repo/ namespace, we would probably need to |
| 13 |
> consider moving other repositories there -- at least the official |
| 14 |
> ones. Of course, it would be a nice result, having everything hosted |
| 15 |
> on git.g.o as git.g.o/repo/${repo_name}.git. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Isn't "repo" fairly redundant? Everything there is a repository. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Ulrich |
Archives