Archives
Archives
| From: | Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Cc: | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted | ||
| Date: | Sun, 15 Mar 2015 10:21:16 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAKmKYaAOgmwAk6WR2q0yL9jYcprb4t7zyhMfwJdWEL7wfzuaBw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | >> If we want a separate repo/ namespace, we would probably need to |
| 3 | >> consider moving other repositories there -- at least the official |
| 4 | >> ones. Of course, it would be a nice result, having everything hosted |
| 5 | >> on git.g.o as git.g.o/repo/${repo_name}.git. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Isn't "repo" fairly redundant? Everything there is a repository. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Everything is a git repo, but not everything is an ebuild/Portage |
| 10 | repo... Which is another point against the use of repo in any |
| 11 | Portage-specific way. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Cheers, |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Dirkjan |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> |