| 1 |
On 15-03-2015 11:20:45 +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> >> If we want a separate repo/ namespace, we would probably need to |
| 4 |
> >> consider moving other repositories there -- at least the official |
| 5 |
> >> ones. Of course, it would be a nice result, having everything hosted |
| 6 |
> >> on git.g.o as git.g.o/repo/${repo_name}.git. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Isn't "repo" fairly redundant? Everything there is a repository. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Everything is a git repo, but not everything is an ebuild/Portage |
| 11 |
> repo... Which is another point against the use of repo in any |
| 12 |
> Portage-specific way. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
tree/gentoo |
| 15 |
tree/prefix |
| 16 |
... ? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Fabian |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 23 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives