Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:55:29
Message-Id: CAJ0EP41O5e9bp-ubjq_fRP7frVmLm+hUvPDrvYj05n1Ht2FYgw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade by "Thomas D."
1 On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Thomas D. <whissi@××××××.de> wrote:
2 > Hi,
3 >
4 > not everyone is using systemd. On my systems for example, I don't have
5 > "/lib/systemd/" (INSTALL_MASK).
6 >
7 > The current news item draft raises question like "When the 'actual
8 > configuration' is in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link... what will
9 > happen to people without systemd (and a INSTALL_MASK set)?"
10 >
11 > Would be nice if the news item and Wiki could handle upgrade path for
12 > systemd *and* non-systemd users...
13 >
14
15 You need to remove /lib/systemd/ from INSTALL_MASK. If you don't want
16 unit files, mask /lib/systemd/system/ instead.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>