| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 24/02/14 10:55 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Thomas D. <whissi@××××××.de> |
| 6 |
> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> Hi, |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> not everyone is using systemd. On my systems for example, I don't |
| 10 |
>> have "/lib/systemd/" (INSTALL_MASK). |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> The current news item draft raises question like "When the |
| 13 |
>> 'actual configuration' is in |
| 14 |
>> /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link... what will happen to |
| 15 |
>> people without systemd (and a INSTALL_MASK set)?" |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> Would be nice if the news item and Wiki could handle upgrade path |
| 18 |
>> for systemd *and* non-systemd users... |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> You need to remove /lib/systemd/ from INSTALL_MASK. If you don't |
| 22 |
> want unit files, mask /lib/systemd/system/ instead. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
..it'd be worth adding this little tidbit to the news item, probably... |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlMLdqYACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDgIAD/W9UzdSD+Iafe3p+/g61tQESl |
| 31 |
PzCBbOK+uV1yIob3fzEBAI2zX/4sGKEjvKUhjZvLo+h/djzkhL+tD4hODYvjWOH9 |
| 32 |
=UN8P |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives