1 |
Steven J Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> posted |
2 |
2115173.05GpC6T6bt@××××××××××××××××××××.info, excerpted below, on Tue, 02 |
3 |
Jun 2009 09:18:54 +0100: |
4 |
|
5 |
> Surely it would be best simply to ask end-users which of a few variants |
6 |
> they'd find easiest to work with? Or indeed for their suggestions; after |
7 |
> all, they spend a lot more time engaging with the cli/config files than |
8 |
> we do. |
9 |
|
10 |
For this end-user, @ means set. Using it at a location other than the |
11 |
beginning for something else is possible and I'd adapt, but it /is/ |
12 |
confusing. |
13 |
|
14 |
:: lacks that confusion. It does have the additional complication of |
15 |
needing quoted or escaped in the shell, but users are supposed to do a |
16 |
--pretend anyway, and after it doesn't output what's expected, a user of |
17 |
any shell experience at all should conclude with little delay that it |
18 |
/could/ be the escaping even if they aren't sure, and a quick suitably |
19 |
escaped trial will confirm it. |
20 |
|
21 |
So either proposed solution has its caveat that users will ultimately |
22 |
need to learn to deal with, but I still prefer the unambiguity of ::. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
26 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
27 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |