| 1 |
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 16:41 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:28:13 +0100 Grobian <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> | I'm thinking of quite dull news, so absolutely not meant to be a |
| 4 |
> | publication like GWN, but just thingis like some commits on the |
| 5 |
> | portage sources that say to fix/implement X, a discussion on project |
| 6 |
> | ML Y working on Z. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Would our users really like to read a lengthy discussion on the |
| 9 |
> intricacies of the changes made to versionator.eclass to improve |
| 10 |
> performance, or the way in which the ten zillion packages needed by |
| 11 |
> the new KDE/Gnome/Xorg release were keyworded for a particular arch, |
| 12 |
> or the design decisions made for vim-spell.eclass to avoid requiring |
| 13 |
> that our users have four gigs of RAM? I mean, it'd be pretty frickin' |
| 14 |
> boring... |
| 15 |
I think Fabian is targetting cross-dev communications there ... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
It'd be time-consuming but sounds interesting. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
There's lots of "unimportant" info, like ... say ... what fixes are in |
| 20 |
the new baselayout? Is gcc4 safe to use? ... |
| 21 |
Having all that in a central place (like planet.g.o, only moderated) |
| 22 |
might help - if there is enough support! |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Patrick |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move |
Archives