| 1 |
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:43:22 -0500 |
| 2 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 01 Dec 2015 11:38, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 5 |
> > I find the multilib eclasses and their separate multilib phase |
| 6 |
> > functions to be confusing, so I was wondering if we could discuss |
| 7 |
> > making multilib support native to portage in eapi 7 so that we can |
| 8 |
> > use the normal phase functions again? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> we cannot hardcode the actual ABIs in PMS because adding/removing ones |
| 11 |
> would require an EAPI update which is a terrible idea |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
nothing prevents defining the ABIs in profiles |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
a line has to be drawn and well thought of; whether it's worth the |
| 16 |
effort, I doubt it |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
however, considering this would make the multilib-portage & multilib |
| 19 |
eclasses ideas converge and with the recent trends in including the |
| 20 |
kitchen sink in PMS, it's not something to discard completely |
Archives