| 1 |
On 01 Dec 2015 11:38, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> I find the multilib eclasses and their separate multilib phase functions |
| 3 |
> to be confusing, so I was wondering if we could discuss making multilib |
| 4 |
> support native to portage in eapi 7 so that we can use the normal phase |
| 5 |
> functions again? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
we cannot hardcode the actual ABIs in PMS because adding/removing ones |
| 8 |
would require an EAPI update which is a terrible idea |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
i don't see a benefit in adding the helper/phase functions either and |
| 11 |
wouldn't actually address your concern: you'd still need to know the |
| 12 |
API and how to use them. |
| 13 |
-mike |
Archives