Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 01:09:37
Message-Id: 1190336320.2750.3.camel@uberpc.marples.name
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs? by "John R. Graham"
1 On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 19:17 -0400, John R. Graham wrote:
2 > Rats. I checked the source and you're right. My problem domain is
3 > smaller than I thought but still valid, I think. Basically the problem
4 > is only with interactive login shells and /root. Not *broken*, per se:
5 > just contrary to recommended practice. The Bash documentation
6 > *recommends* that a ~/.bash_profile exists so that ~/.bashrc can be made
7 > to be sourced for login shells and codifies its recommendation by
8 > putting a template .bash_profile in /etc/skel.
9
10 Looking over the bash man page, I cannot see the word recommended
11 anywhere near .bash_profile. Could you clarify where you think bash
12 recommends this?
13
14 Thanks
15
16 Roy
17
18 --
19 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs? "John R. Graham" <n3440d@×××××.com>