| 1 |
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 07:50:13PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Sven Wegener wrote: |
| 6 |
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 06:56:43PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> >>I'm in favor of this. Would you mind calling it package.autouse, |
| 9 |
> >>package.use.auto or are you set on .force? |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > As Mike already wrote those names are too confusing with the automatic |
| 13 |
> > activated USE flags. We already had some suggestions in this thread, but |
| 14 |
> > none of them actually matched the purpose of the file. At least in my |
| 15 |
> > opinion. use.force matches it best, but the "force" part is a quite hard |
| 16 |
> > term. How about use.profile? Because these USE flags are activated or |
| 17 |
> > needed by the profile. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> How about use.required, since they're required by the profile? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Sounds good to me. use.required sounds softer than use.force but still |
| 22 |
has this "touch me and things may break horribly" bit. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Sven Wegener |
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 27 |
http://www.gentoo.org/ |
Archives