Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force support
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 02:52:32
Message-Id: 42AF9765.8090800@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force support by Sven Wegener
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Sven Wegener wrote:
5 > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 06:56:43PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
6 >
7 >>I'm in favor of this. Would you mind calling it package.autouse,
8 >>package.use.auto or are you set on .force?
9 >
10 >
11 > As Mike already wrote those names are too confusing with the automatic
12 > activated USE flags. We already had some suggestions in this thread, but
13 > none of them actually matched the purpose of the file. At least in my
14 > opinion. use.force matches it best, but the "force" part is a quite hard
15 > term. How about use.profile? Because these USE flags are activated or
16 > needed by the profile.
17
18 How about use.required, since they're required by the profile?
19
20 Donnie
21 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
22 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
23
24 iD8DBQFCr5dlXVaO67S1rtsRApFKAKC917D/EwbWvRLY4R8uZ5WwcCk5zgCgw1jE
25 5solEKLmab3YZXV7qehfXSg=
26 =VfRe
27 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
28 --
29 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: use.force support Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force support Sven Wegener <swegener@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force support Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>