| 1 |
Phil Richards wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> | ~ # emerge -puv --newuse gnome |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>| |
| 6 |
>| These are the packages that I would merge, in order: |
| 7 |
>| |
| 8 |
>| Calculating dependencies \ |
| 9 |
>| !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "sys-apps/pmount" have been masked. |
| 10 |
>| !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: |
| 11 |
>| - sys-apps/pmount-0.9.3-r3 (masked by: package.mask) |
| 12 |
>| # Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> (7 Sep 2005) |
| 13 |
>| # Remasking because the Gnome herd is too lazy to look |
| 14 |
>| # into bugs that are over 4 months old with regards to |
| 15 |
>| # hal and dbus. Patches provided and everything. |
| 16 |
>| # When I volunteered to fix it and handle any issues.. |
| 17 |
>| # I received the stock "wait for foser" response. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
>Normally, I would just unmask pmount, but the comment doesn't exactly |
| 22 |
>fill me with confidence as regards the stability of pmount (and whereas |
| 23 |
>I am happy for gnome to crash in a heap, I tend to be a little more |
| 24 |
>cautious around things that work at lower levels in the system)... |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
>Should I just go ahead and unmask, or what if I want to test out gnome |
| 27 |
>2.12? |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Unmask pmount, it is needed now to get useful hal support where you can |
| 32 |
mount USB drives from nautilus when they are hot plugged. This is |
| 33 |
because with the new hal they have removed the fstab updater. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
( or you could just put -hal in your USE flags, but better just |
| 36 |
unmasking it and finding the bugs - I have not found any ) |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Stefan |
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives