| 1 |
On Saturday 19 November 2005 02:18 pm, Patrick McLean wrote: |
| 2 |
> This thread has had a disturbing amount of bickering, and there appears |
| 3 |
> to be a bit of a sentiment that arch testers don't contribute anything |
| 4 |
> more than a normal user. I have filed and commented on more bugs in the |
| 5 |
> week since I became an arch tester than I had total in the 3 years I |
| 6 |
> have been using Gentoo before that. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Please don't get the wrong impression.. The bickering is not about whether |
| 9 |
ATs get to have their own repo/service to sync from, nor about whether they |
| 10 |
deserve email accounts, it is about implementation of those, and how the |
| 11 |
council is handling it. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Personally, I am fine with the idea of a repo and fine with the email |
| 14 |
accounts. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-C |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Corey Shields |
| 20 |
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team |
| 21 |
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees |
| 22 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives