[gentoo-dev] Re: "Slacking" arches - which are stable, which aren't?

[Ryan Hill]

On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:44:51 -0500
Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> wrote:

> I would suggest moving all the "slacking" arches to "experimental"
> until there is desire from the dev community (read: manpower) to
> support a stable tree again. Until then, it seems pretty pointless to
> keep assigning bugs to these arches and they just keep rotting there
> because no one gets around to them.
>
> 2 cents,
> -Jeremy

++ $473.57


-- 
gcc-porting,                                      by design, by neglect
treecleaner,                              for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo     EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662