1 |
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:44:51 -0500 |
3 |
> Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> I would suggest moving all the "slacking" arches to "experimental" |
6 |
>> until there is desire from the dev community (read: manpower) to |
7 |
>> support a stable tree again. Until then, it seems pretty pointless to |
8 |
>> keep assigning bugs to these arches and they just keep rotting there |
9 |
>> because no one gets around to them. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> 2 cents, |
12 |
>> -Jeremy |
13 |
> |
14 |
> ++ $473.57 |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
My aim with the email wasn't to start up this discussion so much as to |
19 |
figure out which arches are supported by stable keywords, and which |
20 |
ones are okay to not request stable keywords so that bugs don't sit |
21 |
around for months without action on them. I know that vapier is |
22 |
pretty much the only dev with an sh or s390 box, but I know there are |
23 |
a couple of people with ARM, I was just hoping we had some sort of |
24 |
official list somewhere. |