| 1 |
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 01:44, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 2 |
> Well, quite frankly devrel has never fallen down on the job quite so |
| 3 |
> often & so hard before handling this particular incident. I don't think |
| 4 |
> it's so unreasonable to have backup plans for preserving Gentoo when |
| 5 |
> devrel cannot respond in a timely manner |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
If you exclude that devrel for a long long while was unable to retire |
| 8 |
developers properly and if you exclude that people bitched about devrel not |
| 9 |
updating docs - then maybe. I'm stating this, please don't take it as |
| 10 |
flaming. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Carsten |
Archives