| 1 |
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 01:40:59AM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> This is how it has been handled so far except in the ciaranm incident. This is |
| 4 |
> how I personally think this should be handled in future. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Well, quite frankly devrel has never fallen down on the job quite so |
| 8 |
often & so hard before handling this particular incident. I don't think |
| 9 |
it's so unreasonable to have backup plans for preserving Gentoo when |
| 10 |
devrel cannot respond in a timely manner |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 14 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives