Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A few questions to our nominees | ||
| Date: | Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:01:24 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20080614140115.1643a030@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A few questions to our nominees by Luca Barbato |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:27:22 +0200 |
| 2 | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Many of them applies as well to the alternative proposal, I wonder |
| 4 | > how you could say we, council, had to vote the other proposal given |
| 5 | > such (and other) issues were open. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | No they don't. The alternative proposal is deliberately simple enough |
| 8 | to avoid those issues, whilst leaving the possibility of a larger |
| 9 | solution that does have scm revision awareness open for the future. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Does this mean you don't have answers then? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A few questions to our nominees | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: A few questions to our nominees | Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> |