Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012]
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:39:09
Message-Id: 1353227901.3059.1.camel@belkin4
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] by Greg KH
1 El dom, 18-11-2012 a las 00:27 -0800, Greg KH escribió:
2 > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:19:21AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
3 > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 03:10:08AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote:
4 > > > You are the one claiming that this is our official fork. None of us are.
5 > >
6 > > It's on the Gentoo github site, and it has the Gentoo Foundation
7 > > copyright all over all of the files in one of the branches, reviewed by
8 > > you.
9 > >
10 > > I think I would be pretty foolish if I somehow thought it was _not_ an
11 > > official fork :)
12 >
13 > Oh, and the README file says it is a Gentoo project:
14 > This is a Gentoo sponsored project and testing is currently
15 > being done with openrc. However, we aim to be distro neutral
16 > and welcome contribution from others using a variety of system
17 > initializations. We also aim towards POSIX compliance.
18 >
19 > So why would I think otherwise?
20 >
21 > thanks,
22 >
23 > greg k-h
24 >
25 >
26
27 Looks like we think different about what a "Gentoo project" means, lets
28 read:
29 http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/herds-and-projects/index.html
30
31 That would explain why both, eudev and systemd "Gentoo projects" can
32 coexist:
33 http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/systemd/index.xml

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature