| 1 |
Am Mittwoch, 9. August 2006 17:50 schrieb Mike Frysinger: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 09 August 2006 10:57, Duncan wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> posted |
| 4 |
> > Pure speculation here, but the idea /might/ have been to separate |
| 5 |
> > prebuilt binary stuff into /emul, so it wouldn't conflict with |
| 6 |
> > future multiarch portage support (which would presumably use |
| 7 |
> > /lib32), which IIRC was hoped to be here by now, but turned out to |
| 8 |
> > be rather complicated and had no portage devs which had that |
| 9 |
> > particular itch they needed to scratch, so... (IOW, no blame or |
| 10 |
> > finger pointing, just that we'd hoped it'd be here by 2.1, and it |
| 11 |
> > isn't, and that's a fact amd64 continues to have to deal with.) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> from what i remember, /emul was done because that's how some other |
| 14 |
> distro was doing it ... but at the time i was staying out of multilib |
| 15 |
> development because it sucked and i didnt have an amd64 |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> now i have an amd64 and this current state annoys me greatly, so |
| 18 |
> rather than bitch all the time, i want to fix it |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Herbs is maintaing the emul-libraries. |
| 21 |
IMHO it shouldn't be to hard to change it from /emul to /lib32 |
| 22 |
and /usr/lib32. And yes, /emul was there from the very beginning aka |
| 23 |
Tester/brad_mssw :-) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Danny |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
| 28 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives