| 1 |
On Tue, 16 May 2006 19:06:24 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" |
| 2 |
<flameeyes@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
| ++ for Halcy0n, and adding from an ebuild maintainer some more, many |
| 4 |
| parts of the current tree are at a minimum understaffed, if we're |
| 5 |
| going to have to start dealing with bugs coming from users |
| 6 |
| experimenting with something else but portage, we'd be _really_ taken |
| 7 |
| over. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
That's rather funny, when one considers the whole BSD profile structure |
| 10 |
and the zillions of ebuild changes that've been made for BSD. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Be realistic here. The changes for Paludis are tiny compared to the |
| 13 |
changes that have been required for various Portage upgrades. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 17 |
Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives