[gentoo-dev] Re: Some council topics for March meeting

[Steve Long]

Stephen Bennett wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 01:58:30 -0800 (PST)
> "Alec Warner" <antarus@g.o> wrote:
>
>> So you are saying you cannot see Daniel's point of view at all?  That
>> Gentoo should perhaps have input on a specification whose goal is to
>> essentially define what a Gentoo Package Manager should be?
>
> Gentoo, and any other parties, will have ample opportunity for input
> long before it gets finalised. Right now, though, soliciting comments
> from all and sundry will be more distracting than productive. We know
> it's currently incomplete and full of holes; we don't need to be told
> it.
>
lol! you talk like gentoo were just one of the crowd. Perhaps all gentoo
devs are in the peanut gallery? That explains a lot..

>> >> Really, I find this weird and ambiguous and you should probably be
>> >> reinstated as a dev or be bumped off of PMS, which should be
>> >> managed by Gentoo developers only.
>
> If you want to make such a distinction, then it's managed by me, and I
> am a Gentoo developer.
>
And if we didn't give a d*mn about such a distinction? IOW if you were
discussing this technically, instead of /politically/ *shock horror*..

>> Because it is difficult to determine 'people who know what they are
>> talking about'.  I would say Brian Harring is one of those, but I
>> have a feeling you would disagree with me.
>
> The second requirement is an ability to work effectively with the other
> people writing it.

Hmm and he has shown such a marked inability to work with anyone. Whereas
ciaran.. well there you go. Obviously we can overlook the fact that he
appears to be leading a core Gentoo project when he has been kicked off the
development team, for reasons which are far too tedious to discuss again
this century.


-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list