| 1 |
Dnia 2013-07-21, o godz. 14:06:12 |
| 2 |
Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> El dom, 21-07-2013 a las 13:57 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: |
| 5 |
> [...] |
| 6 |
> > 5. I have doubts about 'emerge -1vDtu @world' speed. It is very |
| 7 |
> > subjective feeling but I feel like reiserfs was actually faster in this |
| 8 |
> > regard. However, space savings would surely benefit our users. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I also feel it faster (or, at least, not slower) with reiserfs, but |
| 12 |
> going from ~300 MB to 79. Not sure if it would benefit from putting |
| 13 |
> squashed image in a different filesystem (it was placed in /root, that |
| 14 |
> is ext4 in my case). Maybe it would be faster if generated image was put |
| 15 |
> in /var/tmp/portage (that is tmpfs in my case) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Using different block size may make a difference. I suspect that most |
| 18 |
important reason for the slowdown is due to random accesses. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Best regards, |
| 22 |
Michał Górny |
Archives