| 1 |
El dom, 21-07-2013 a las 13:57 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: |
| 2 |
[...] |
| 3 |
> 5. I have doubts about 'emerge -1vDtu @world' speed. It is very |
| 4 |
> subjective feeling but I feel like reiserfs was actually faster in this |
| 5 |
> regard. However, space savings would surely benefit our users. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I also feel it faster (or, at least, not slower) with reiserfs, but |
| 9 |
going from ~300 MB to 79. Not sure if it would benefit from putting |
| 10 |
squashed image in a different filesystem (it was placed in /root, that |
| 11 |
is ext4 in my case). Maybe it would be faster if generated image was put |
| 12 |
in /var/tmp/portage (that is tmpfs in my case) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
But I am testing it with plain squashfs (without write support) |
Archives