| 1 |
Mark Loeser schrieb: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> said: |
| 3 |
>> that's actually exactly what i'm encouraging. i'm not worried about such |
| 4 |
>> issues as they're easily resolved by people posting the full build log. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Which is great, but I think this is something we should discuss and |
| 7 |
> figure out if this is something we want to introduce into the tree (too |
| 8 |
> late now, but better late than never). If it is something we want to |
| 9 |
> move forward with, it should be introduced at the package manager level |
| 10 |
> instead of being an in-tree package manager specific feature. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I'm coming at this from a QA perspective and if we want to do it for one |
| 13 |
> package, it should be introduced for all. We should document it and |
| 14 |
> know how to support it as well. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
+1 on that, |
| 17 |
quite a bunch of overlayed ebuilds won't be needed if additional patches |
| 18 |
could be applied this way. we should just find a way to enable/disable |
| 19 |
this and make it visible on support requests. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Greetz |
| 22 |
-Jokey |
Archives