| 1 |
On wto, 2017-07-25 at 08:26 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 07/25/2017 07:52 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > I have no clue what you mean. I'm just saying that if you push 10 |
| 5 |
> > changes in 10 commits, you don't have to go straight to -r10 in a |
| 6 |
> > single push. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Exactly. Do that instead of hoping that no one checks out your |
| 10 |
> intermediate commits. There's no limit to the number of revisions we can |
| 11 |
> have, and trying to keep track of when it's safe to push in your head is |
| 12 |
> asking for trouble. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
How is that relevant? Revision bumps are merely a tool to encourage |
| 16 |
'automatic' rebuilds of packages during @world upgrade. I can't think of |
| 17 |
a single use case where somebody would actually think it sane to |
| 18 |
checkout one commit after another, and run @world upgrade in the middle |
| 19 |
of it. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Best regards, |
| 23 |
Michał Górny |
Archives